Why should I get an LCD Flat Panel Monitor, instead of a new CRT Video Monitor? - lcd monitor deals
I get a CRT of the former about $ 100. The best offer for an LCD monitor I've seen is about $ 200 Is it worth it?
Saturday, January 23, 2010
Lcd Monitor Deals Why Should I Get An LCD Flat Panel Monitor, Instead Of A New CRT Video Monitor?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
The new LCD flat screen occupies less space.
With the old CRT monitors, you can not see the dust that builds up behind him. You can dust with new flat-screen monitors to see and it is much easier to clean.
Since the new flat do not generate heat, the Cabinet Office is not so hot in the summer.
The amount of the new LCD flat panel display can be set so no need to adjust the height of the old books or a stack of printer paper.
The new flat is actually larger for the same rating as the old CRT. So 17 inches is a big step forward. But jumping to a 19 "anyway, because you have the space for them.
From flat screens are not deep, you can click on a narrow table.
So you're wondering about the produce electromagnetic radiation from the old CRT monitors. Is it dangerous? Not yet decided. Quit worry me LCDs do not emit electromagnetic radiation.
LCD flat screen, probably much longer than the oldCRT. Thus, the new will take about 20 years instead of 7 to 9 years.
CRT monitors flicker. LCDs not easy.
The old CRT was like a rock, strong, with new flat-panel monitor is easy to move around
When the CRT taken and destroyed, causing damage to the ozone layer of our planet.
During the increase of brightness on a CRT, it is natural to lose focus. LCDs do not.
It seems clear, NO, to spend a little now and the benefits of long-term cost savings.
While there are many nice to have an LCD, of course, you should be aware of the development of LCD back-and LCD screens at the bottom, you can simply go better with a CRT monitor.
First, you must be careful to screen resolutions. Since a CRT can display different resolutions, all well know, is usually the maximum, and for each resolution as for you. With an LCD screen that only one resolution. LCDs I've seen "down" to a lower resolution. Frankly, it's not pretty, and I would not do it if I had no choice. Is far too vague, and a CRT screen is similar to a picture of the comparison.
Most low-end LCD display is 1024x768. It is a joint resolution and the resolution is also on the laptop. Check In any case, somewhat less than that. That is, if I have disturbed more than eighty dollars in my pocket on a screen, not me with this low resolution to spend. 1280x960 / 1280x1024 wouldat least in my head. 1600x1200 would be ideal.
Most monitors can do at least 1280x1024, and many others. If you use a lot of games of chance, or sometimes an application that you would have liked more "screen space" to do at work, can this range, something to go with an LCD screen lost. Also, especially in the game, the rapid response of a CRT could be important to you.
In bright environments can see it easier for you to a CRT than an LCD, but most people do not, their computers outside, or bright, sunny rooms.
An LCD is considerably less power than a CRT, but in reality Unplug your refrigerator is a big difference in your monthly electricity bill.
As life expectancy. Of course, your LCD screen at the end of May, a CRT, but during the last seven years, does it matter? You do not want to continue to use either the time, on the assumption that technological advances in the display market continues.
When the CRT dull eyes, I hope you find it more into line LCDYou EABL. TV to flicker. I do not think many people complain about. Movies in a Flash movie. Who really makes me mad, but most people do not seem to mind. Have a little perspective on it.
In contrast to the reaction of the other person (he calls the source is a satire, seems to have written) in manufacturing LCD screens that those who seem to concern over the ozone worries. CRT seem critical, as electricity is generated with respect to ozone.
And all of this is "the long-term cost savings," someone asked him to collect more spent by hundreds of dollars in additional costs. If you have an LCD, all power to you, but you do not play to save money. Even with the cost projections that I saw, after four years estimated at 40 hours per week Opper, with electricity, plus 40% more than the wage-price was, it will not make that distinction.
LCDs are good and are easy to assess whether your destination on your computer is more clear and voluminous. I see it. I dOr read that my next purchase will be an LCD. But I think it would be well advised not to go back, as "modernization" of the LCD. If you are very far above their budget, to sell IBM Certified Used Equipment. I do not have the experience of its desktop monitors (LCD only on ThinkPads), but I was very happy with other products from them.
Personal preferences, you need space for flat screen consider.if factor is whether the money factor, then CRT.
LCD produce sharper images and consume less energy, generate less heat and wasting energy. He also weighs much less and need much less space.
Plan is what it is ...... Saving flat space
CRTs are still good and cheap relly 2
Post a Comment