Has anyone hired a marine surveyor who missed major/obvious problems on boat? Were they liable in any way? - marine insurance surveyor
Naval Inspector has lost significant structural problems such as rotten bulkhead cracks in the fuselage with stringers of the fuselage separated from the engine, damage resulted to the hospital - both through the closure. Surveyor had no insurance, but personal property. Boat Broker past have heard the boat twice. I believe that the inspector gave the boat, the "green light", because the boat brokers knew that they buy the boat if he had had a positive poll. I managed to sell "the bill of goods" did not adequately take into the actual condition of the vessel into account. I am currently $ 110,000. My dilemma is that I should advance with the process that will probably cost 30,000 U.S. dollars, with the possibility of compensation for my losses, or money to throw the bad ones? Or I see that rescue vessels were given a residual value of $ 5500? Or on foot to reach the problem and attempt to conclude an agreement with the bank to reduce my outstanding loan of U.S. $ 60,000 if you pay off the balance is full?
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Marine Insurance Surveyor Has Anyone Hired A Marine Surveyor Who Missed Major/obvious Problems On Boat? Were They Liable In Any Way?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
, Total demand mode. Buy Yur contract for the vessel would have read something in the favorable results of a survey. When the questionnaire was poor, and I may be subject to a surveyor, if the damage is so obvious, it should not be overlooked. Get a lawyer to represent you on contingency, and if you win, you receive a part of the solution. Calls upon all newspapers and let them know what happened.
It appears that you have a legitimate claim. I recommend submitting your problem to an engineering firm such as ESI (http://www.esi-il.com) as they pursue research and help you can.
Post a Comment